With Uber and WeWork struggling, are VCs really better than hedge funds at picking winners?
Investors are questioning how good the world’s most prominent venture capital fund is at picking winners. Doubts about the Vision Fund, the flagship investment vehicle for Masayoshi Son’s SoftBank Group Corp., intensified after the collapse of the planned $20 billion WeWork Cos. initial public offering, but they’d been floating around for a while.
SoftBank’s bad year began in May with Uber Technologies Inc.’s disappointing IPO and continued when Slack Technologies Inc.’s June direct listing on the New York Stock Exchange failed to impress. By September the fund was up $11.4 billion on $76.3 billion in investments deployed over two years, according to its Nov. 8 investor briefing. But a big chunk of that came from just two deals: the August 2018 sale of Flipkart Online Services Pvt Ltd. to Walmart Inc. and some well-timed trades in chipmaker Nvidia Corp., which it exited in January.
As for the rest of the fund’s investments, only consumer stocks, which account for 20% of its portfolio, have reported decent gains. Fifty percent of the Vision Fund’s holdings are in transportation logistics and real estate, making it a poor hedge against market volatility. After taking writedowns on Uber and WeWork, it’s already in the red for both sectors.
Here’s a provocative question: What if hedge funds—passive but nimble investors—are better at identifying unicorns than venture capital is? Unlike Son, who has a habit of writing multimillion-dollar checks after only 10 minutes of getting-to-know-you time, hedge fund managers are all about due diligence. Tiger Global Management’s assets, for example, have swelled 80% since May 2015, including big gains in the past 12 months from Juul Labs Inc.’s $12.8 billion deal with Altria Group Inc. and the market debut of Peloton Interactive Inc., which Tiger has backed since 2014.
Son has survived tricky times before. During the dot-com bust, SoftBank’s shares tumbled 99%. But the company stayed around because one of its investments—in Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.—paid off spectacularly. Perhaps Son will hit the jackpot again. But a few standout deals don’t make him a great startup picker. In fact, retail investors would do better not to follow his lead. Based on his past success rate, most of the unicorns the Vision Fund brings to market will be flops.
Source: Bloomberg
Can’t stop reading? Read more
PGIM Real Estate raises €1.8bn for final close of PGIM Real Estate Capital VII
The seventh fund in PGIM Real Estate’s European flagship high yield debt fund series, PGIM Real Estate Capital VII (PRECap VII), has closed on €1.82bn, the largest European real estate debt fund closed in 2021. PGIM Real Estate is the real estate investment and...
Longer hold times put private equity strategies to the test
The distance between top-performing private equity funds and the also-rans is likely to grow as firms avoid exiting investments in an unsettled market and hold onto portfolio companies longer. These longer hold periods will test private equity firms' value-creation...
Elemental Holding completes $290m equity investment
Elemental Holding SA, a global urban mining and recycling company that originated in Poland and now has headquarters in Luxemburg, says it has completed a $290 million equity private placement from a group of international financial institutions led by the...




